![]() Keep in mind this would improve the situation for 99% of the users. If Telegram has a preferred font – and it does actually, this is a bit hazy, but at least it has preferences set by the designers by the looks of it – and if we have remote font solutions that add minimum overhead – and we have – why not? Which brings me to my original question – why not use remote fonts? There literally is no reason. If webogram has a uniform UI across platforms, what reason does it have not to have uniform typography? ![]() System fonts are designed to pair with the system UI – no part of the system UI is used in webogram. ![]() You can’t just use the system toolkit there, and webogram doesn’t try at all. But this isn’t a native app, it’s a web app, it’s designed to run in a browser. Does it make sense from the view of a native app? Of course, for a variety of reasons. Mimicking the system look or using system features doesn’t make sense in all cases.The situation is a bit better on macOS, but not by much. Building the image of your business off system fonts is (almost always) a terrible idea, because they are either poorly designed (Arial) or incredibly overused (Helvetica). Typography is an important part of branding and visual identity. ![]() Better to use system font for everything, unless you have good reason not to. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |